Skip to main content

Environmental Evaluation of Development Proposals: Case Study: the Adani Project ~ A Need for Review?

The Scientific Roundtable:
A More Effective Role for Science in Environmental Dispute Resolution

TAGS: Adani; coal; development; environment; evaluation; scientific evidence; information conflicts; approval; conflict management; scientific roundtable
After almost nine years, nine legal reviews and $3.7 billion in “start-up” costs, the ‘Adani Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project’ was finally approved by the Queensland Government in June 2019. It will be one of the largest coal mines in the world.
Why have the planning and evaluation processes taken so long? Must the history of conflict and delay repeat?
Some form of objective review of the environmental evaluation and approval processes for Adani is warranted to offset this concern.
READ MORE...

The next article in this series will review:
Acceptance of Scientific Findings ~
Best Available Science -v- Relevant and Reliable Science


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Resolving Cultural Heritage Protection and Development Conflicts on Indigenous Lands

“ P rotecting cultural heritage and development are not mutually exclusive; we can have both, but projects have to be well-designed.” Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek (2024).   The recent decision by the Federal Environment Minister to shut down a tailings dam for a gold mine development, to protect Indigenous cultural heritage, has ignited controversy and conflict.   The controversy is not only over the decision’s impact on the viability of the Regis Resources’ Gold Mine Project at Orange, Central-Western NSW.  It has also highlighted the complexity of the problem when cultural heritage protection (with its focus on Traditional knowledge) and  development (with its focus on Western science) collide over future land use. There is now  community concern that history may repeat in Australia for development projects proposed on Indigenous owned and controlled lands. However, there would be little dispute that the above statement by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Problem-Solving Pathway to Resolve the Controversy Over Fuel Load, Hazard Reduction Burns, Risk Analysis and Bushfires: A Royal Commission or a Scientific Round-Table?

TAGS: Bushfires; Australia; climate change;   hazard reduction; fuel load; window of opportunity; ecology; habitat;  threatened species;  resilience; scientific round-table; royal commission; conflict resolution 1.0   The 2019-2020 bush fire season in Australia has been one of the worst fire seasons on record. The total area of land burned during the current bushfire season now exceeds 10.7 million hectares (26.4 million acres). 2.0    All Australian mainland States have been impacted. Thousands of homes have been destroyed; 27 people have been killed . There have been significant impacts on  native fauna and their habitat. The following issues are reviewed: - (a)   Preparedness: Drought Management and Bushfire Hazard Reduction (b)  Issues That Contribute to Fuel Load And Hazard Reduction (c)   The Wider Application for Resilience in the Australian Environment (d)   Climate Change, Fuel Build-...
Post a Comment
Read more

Towards an Independent Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mechanism Based on Environmental Dispute Resolution Principles & the Scientific Standards of Testability, Objectivity & Impartiality

TAGS :     COVID-19; evaluation; WHO; World Health Assembly; information conflicts; scientific round-table; fact-finding; testability; objectivity; impartiality; data mediation; consensus decision-making          A Google search of the key words :  COVID - 19 evaluation science conflict resolution     turns up 150,000,000 results.  The author's article appears on Google page 1 at #1 : 10 November 2020. The article provides a road-map for a "stepwise process for an impartial,  independent and comprehensive evaluation" of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. READ MORE …  
Post a Comment
Read more