Skip to main content

The Future of Coal, the Paris Agreement & Conflict Resolution: Google Search Results as an Aid to Resolve the Controversy

TAGS: Paris Agreement; COP25; coal; future; risk; best available science; sustainable development; equity; scientific round-table; positions; interests
1.0    Any decision on this issue requires the Paris Agreement’s obligations to be implemented “on the basis of equity” - as well as “in accordance with the best available science”.
2.0   The results from a Google Search on “the future of coal highlight the contradictory global positions held on this issue: While an international consensus is emerging for the position of a fast and orderly phasing out of coal mining and coal-generated energy, new coal supply and demand infrastructure continues to be developed.
3.0    But has clean coal technology R&D reached the stage of being the “best available science” for a decision to be made to resolve this controversy?
4.0   The challenge for COP25 is to promote a problem-solving pathway that counterbalances the "need" for an objective process to decide the future of coal and the "concern" over the lack of the best available relevant and reliable science on clean coal technology.
READ MORE ...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Resolving Cultural Heritage Protection and Development Conflicts on Indigenous Lands

“ P rotecting cultural heritage and development are not mutually exclusive; we can have both, but projects have to be well-designed.” Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek (2024).   The recent decision by the Federal Environment Minister to shut down a tailings dam for a gold mine development, to protect Indigenous cultural heritage, has ignited controversy and conflict.   The controversy is not only over the decision’s impact on the viability of the Regis Resources’ Gold Mine Project at Orange, Central-Western NSW.  It has also highlighted the complexity of the problem when cultural heritage protection (with its focus on Traditional knowledge) and  development (with its focus on Western science) collide over future land use. There is now  community concern that history may repeat in Australia for development projects proposed on Indigenous owned and controlled lands. However, there would be little dispute that the above statement by ...

A Problem-Solving Pathway to Resolve the Controversy Over Fuel Load, Hazard Reduction Burns, Risk Analysis and Bushfires: A Royal Commission or a Scientific Round-Table?

TAGS: Bushfires; Australia; climate change;   hazard reduction; fuel load; window of opportunity; ecology; habitat;  threatened species;  resilience; scientific round-table; royal commission; conflict resolution 1.0   The 2019-2020 bush fire season in Australia has been one of the worst fire seasons on record. The total area of land burned during the current bushfire season now exceeds 10.7 million hectares (26.4 million acres). 2.0    All Australian mainland States have been impacted. Thousands of homes have been destroyed; 27 people have been killed . There have been significant impacts on  native fauna and their habitat. The following issues are reviewed: - (a)   Preparedness: Drought Management and Bushfire Hazard Reduction (b)  Issues That Contribute to Fuel Load And Hazard Reduction (c)   The Wider Application for Resilience in the Australian Environment (d)   Climate Change, Fuel Build-...

Towards an Independent Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mechanism Based on Environmental Dispute Resolution Principles & the Scientific Standards of Testability, Objectivity & Impartiality

TAGS :     COVID-19; evaluation; WHO; World Health Assembly; information conflicts; scientific round-table; fact-finding; testability; objectivity; impartiality; data mediation; consensus decision-making          A Google search of the key words :  COVID - 19 evaluation science conflict resolution     turns up 150,000,000 results.  The author's article appears on Google page 1 at #1 : 10 November 2020. The article provides a road-map for a "stepwise process for an impartial,  independent and comprehensive evaluation" of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. READ MORE …