Skip to main content

Planning for a COVID-19 Future: A Road Map for Moving to Co-Existence and a Resilient Australian Society

TAGS: COVID-19; resilience; response; transition; recovery; vaccine hesitancy; acceptable risk; trans-science; IRGC; risk assessment; concern assessment; inter-generational equity; sustainable development; public health; information conflicts; health literacy; scientific innovations; vaccination, diffusion, adoption.

       Concern over the appropriate problem-solving pathway for Australia to adopt to effectively address the global COVID-19 pandemic has ignited public controversy and conflict. 

     One media critique of the response in Australia to the pandemic refers to the “lack of balanced analysis of the harm of lockdowns versus the harm of COVID”.

    Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic - caused by different opinions on what scientific information is relevant, different interpretations of the same information or insufficient information - has created scientific information conflicts.

      Any effective future national plan for Australia’s COVID-19 future should be based on two inter-dependent and mutually supporting cornerstones: -

(i)     The plan should resonate with a vision for a resilient Australian society. Resilience is a unifying scientific concept having a long history of application in the management of natural and human systems following disturbance e.g., for human systems, a global pandemic. The concept of resilience is based on two phases having quite different goals: Response to, and recovery from, the disturbance; and

(ii)    Recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic is clearly a classic sustainable development problem to resolve - not simply a public health crisis! Sustainable solutions balance public health, economic, social, and cultural impacts and inequalities that have been created by the pandemic.

A conflict management approach to planning for a resilient society,

 in a post-COVID-19 future, is outlined in a 3-part article to follow.

PART 1. Planning for a COVID-19 Future: Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic ~ Information Conflicts and Health Literacy (Posted 04 October 2021)

PART 2.Planning for a COVID-19 Future: Transitioning to Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic ~ Risk Appraisal, Concern Assessment and Vaccine Hesitancy (08 October 2021)

PART 3. Planning for a COVID-19 Future: Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic ~ Co-Existence and Sustainable Development (08 October 2021)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Resolving Cultural Heritage Protection and Development Conflicts on Indigenous Lands

“ P rotecting cultural heritage and development are not mutually exclusive; we can have both, but projects have to be well-designed.” Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek (2024).   The recent decision by the Federal Environment Minister to shut down a tailings dam for a gold mine development, to protect Indigenous cultural heritage, has ignited controversy and conflict.   The controversy is not only over the decision’s impact on the viability of the Regis Resources’ Gold Mine Project at Orange, Central-Western NSW.  It has also highlighted the complexity of the problem when cultural heritage protection (with its focus on Traditional knowledge) and  development (with its focus on Western science) collide over future land use. There is now  community concern that history may repeat in Australia for development projects proposed on Indigenous owned and controlled lands. However, there would be little dispute that the above statement by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Environmental Evaluation of Development Proposals. Case Study: The Adani Project ~ A Need for Review?

2.    Scientific Uncertainty,  the Politicization of Science and Public Interest Environmental Conflicts TAGS:   Adani; coal mine; information conflict; science; politics; public interest; community consultation; silo science; Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.      Politicization of science means that the interpretat ion of scientific information is shaped for political gain in a way that  distorts its true meaning.    T his article reviews why public interest environmental conflicts, like the Adani project, can lead to politicization. And an understanding of what politicization of science means: How it arises and how it may be offset.  READ MORE … The next article in this series will review environmental decision-making, incomplete and unavailable information and the EIS.
Post a Comment
Read more

Environmental Evaluation of Development Proposals Case Study: the Adani Project ~ A Need for Review?

3. E nvironmental Impact Statements & Scientific Uncertainty:  A Decision-Making Aid or the Decision End Point? TAGS:  Adani; coal mine; evaluation; EIS; environmental impact audit;  US 40 C.F.R. Section 1502.22 ;  US National Environmental Policy Act 1969 ; incomplete information; scientific uncertainty; scientific roundtable  1.    Any review and reform of the environmental evaluation and approval process of major development projects, like the Adani project, needs to be directed at a primary source of the problems created by scientific uncertainty in the EIS. 2.   Problems that not only caused conflict, litigation and inordinate delays for environmental evaluation and approval – but also confounded the integrity of the decision-making process . 3.    It would be prudent for Government to be aware of the US experience: That “no other strategy offers a more telling acknowledgement of the legitimacy of local concern...
Post a Comment
Read more