Skip to main content

COMMENT: Action For Climate Change and InterGenerational Equity: Is Sustainability the Elephant in the Room?

     The media coverage that followed a protest by a group of climate activists in Brisbane on 01 February focussed more on the “general overreach” of government in silencing protesters - rather than on understanding activist concerns: Whether “we are acting appropriately or urgently enough on climate change”.

Whilst there may be divided public opinion on rights to protest, there should be no dispute that the activist’s concerns drew attention to serious issues related to action for climate change.

Australia’s new Climate Change Act 2022 came into force on 15 September 2022. GHG emissions are to be reduced  by 43% on 2005 levels by 2030 and to reach net-zero by 2050.

But the legislation does not as yet provide a national plan on how these targets are to be achieved.

In the absence of any national plan for action for climate change, climate activist concerns about what the future holds for our children and grandchildren are real and warrant wider conversation.

Concern for future generations falls squarely within the environmental science concept of intergenerational equity i.e. ensuring fairness between generations. It is the foundation for sustainable development.

One  of  the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is “Climate Action”: A Target for achieving this sustainable development goal is to “Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning...The aim is to achieve this goal by 2030": Target 13.2.

The Paris Agreement imposes a binding obligation requiring all countries emission reductions to be made “on the basis of equity and in the context of sustainable development”.

Achieving sustainable development requires its three cornerstones to be evaluated: Environmental, economic, and social (including cultural) objectives.

To ensure that future risks from climate change to people, economies, and ecosystems are effectively addressed, all objectives are weighted equally, and balanced fairly; and not focussed inordinately on any one objective.

A national plan for a power system should be based on a systematic and objective evaluation to find the optimum balance between  renewables and all feasible and viable climate action option(s).

It must lead to a sustainable solution that provides, not only affordable energy, but also reliable, and secure energy. To do this, the power system needs to be both predictable and dispatchable.

Without a national plan, 

today’s emission reduction targets 

may prove to be an “illusory promise” -  

a promise made which is uncertain, indefinite, vague or impossible to fulfil.

TAGS: Climate change; action; emissions; national plan; illusory promise; Paris Agreement; sustainability; inter-generational equity; protests; activism.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Resolving Cultural Heritage Protection and Development Conflicts on Indigenous Lands

“ P rotecting cultural heritage and development are not mutually exclusive; we can have both, but projects have to be well-designed.” Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek (2024).   The recent decision by the Federal Environment Minister to shut down a tailings dam for a gold mine development, to protect Indigenous cultural heritage, has ignited controversy and conflict.   The controversy is not only over the decision’s impact on the viability of the Regis Resources’ Gold Mine Project at Orange, Central-Western NSW.  It has also highlighted the complexity of the problem when cultural heritage protection (with its focus on Traditional knowledge) and  development (with its focus on Western science) collide over future land use. There is now  community concern that history may repeat in Australia for development projects proposed on Indigenous owned and controlled lands. However, there would be little dispute that the above statement by ...

What is the Status of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice Process: The Decision End Point or a Decision-Making Aid? A Conflict Management Perspective

            Divergent public opinion and controversy has arisen in Australia over a referendum the Federal Government intends to hold later this year. Specifically, that an advisory body known as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice (“ the Voice ”) may make representations to Parliament and the Executive on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. However, the available information to facilitate voting  about the “ the Voice process ”  at the referendum has been an issue.     A conflict management framework  was applied to address this issue. The focus was on the  “interests”  (or  needs and concerns ) about the Voice process that the public have in relation to the referendum question –  rather than the voting   “position”  they may hold . The features of “ the Voice process ” were compared with public participation processes for resolving public int...

Environmental Evaluation of Development Proposals. Case Study: The Adani Project ~ A Need for Review?

Some form of objective review of the environmental evaluation and approval processes for the ‘Adani Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project’ is warranted to address the reasons the final approval was granted  in June 2019.  In a series of articles that follow, the scientific and public interest concerns that ignited the conflict, litigation and delay will be reviewed in a conflict resolution framework .  Must history repeat? 1.   Acceptance of Scientific Findings: Best Available Science ~v~ Relevant and Reliable Science TAGS:  Adani; coal mine; conflict; best available science; relevant and reliable science;  Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc               The focus of this article is on a source of information conflict that created scientific uncertainty for Adani: Different interpretations of the scientific information base as to what is “the best available science”. READ MORE … The next art...